- Compulsory licenses
- Required to be given by law
- You can use it without permission so long as you pay
- Term extensions
- Berne Convention
- Author’s life plus 50 years
- Photos: 25 years from creation
- Movies: 50 years from showing (or creation if never shown)
- Can always go longer (i.e. author’s life + 70 years in the US)
- Public good?
- Berne Convention
- Napster
- 1999 - Network Peer-to-peer file sharing software focused on sharing MP3’s
- Copied from one computer to the next
- Required a central server
- Music became free-as-in-cost - high demand for streaming
- Digital Rights Management
- Software and/or hardware that uses encryption to limit reproduction and re-use of digital content
- Difficult by nature of digital goods
- “Defective by design” - Free Software Foundation
- DMCA
- Blocks anything that breaks DRM unless there is no other way to get to a work
- Distributing anti-DRM is criminal
- Section 1201 - librarian of congress exemptions
- Safe harbor provision
- Does this at all sound like Licensing of the Press Act?
- Sony CD’s that made markers illegal…
- Sony “root kits” - was anti-virus for it a section 1201 violation?
- DeCSS
- Program to remove DRM from DVD’s
- Illegal under the DMCA
- Lots creative ways to get around it - t-shirts, designs, songs, etc
- Similar to how PGP got out of the United States
- Similar thing happened to BluRay DRM
- On-line DRM has the possibility of being more difficult
- Streaming services stopped illegal downloads
- Limewire, Kazza, Morpheus and other services all continued after Napster
- The demand for large-scale access to a huge library of content continued
- Eventually Netflix started streaming. Spotify got popular
- People were willing to pay a reasonable amount (or listen to ads)
- It was more convenient so that’s where they went
- Widevine is the current major DRM implementation for many of these services
- Disney plus - fracturing
- Disney started buying up as many properties as it could manage
- Disney has had its vault strategy
- Low price to gain market share (“Dumping”)
- Hulu and Netflix have their own content
- Fractured landscape - more cost, more difficult
- Drive users toward other means?
- What are today’s challenges
- Today’s laws benefit publishers to the determent of the public and even, in some cases, to the artist
- Prince and his name
- Unable to create new derivative works - slows the growth of the “useful arts”
- Over 99.9% of value is already captured according to Lawrence Lessig
- Orphaned works
- How do we create a new Statute of Anne?
- New law or reform
- Need to re-focus on the balance of the public vs the author
- Shorter term, better predictability
- Need to deal with the “Mickey Mouse” problem
- Should focus on empowering the artist, not the publisher ___
- Today’s laws benefit publishers to the determent of the public and even, in some cases, to the artist
Download | Podcast Feed
Copyrights are commonplace in our world. We continue our discussion on their purpose and current state.